Moderator
M
Moderator
13:00, 16th Feb 2016
GhostThruster: that face is really well drawn and defined, but it needs more highlights to flesh out the form and give the icon a light source. furthermore, the red is overwhelmingly monotonous and blends the face into the background too much. give it highlights, and some more diverse colours and this will be a fantastic icon
14:07, 22nd Feb 2016
GhostThruster: good that you made the face more discernible from the background, but it still needs stronger highlights. now that it's brightened a bit more, i've also noticed its shadows are far too dark - shadows in wc3 should never be pitch black, and you shouldn't define your shapes via a black outline either. lighten the shadows & remove or minimise the black outlines, otherwise it looks too cartoony and almost cell-shaded.
same applies to female icon.
GhostThruster: that face is really well drawn and defined, but it needs more highlights to flesh out the form and give the icon a light source. furthermore, the red is overwhelmingly monotonous and blends the face into the background too much. give it highlights, and some more diverse colours and this will be a fantastic icon
14:07, 22nd Feb 2016
GhostThruster: good that you made the face more discernible from the background, but it still needs stronger highlights. now that it's brightened a bit more, i've also noticed its shadows are far too dark - shadows in wc3 should never be pitch black, and you shouldn't define your shapes via a black outline either. lighten the shadows & remove or minimise the black outlines, otherwise it looks too cartoony and almost cell-shaded.
same applies to female icon.
17:29, 3rd Mar 2016
GhostThruster: no changes made, but considering how well it's drawn i'll give this one an approval. shame you haven't updated it, but pm me if you do improve it with the suggested changes in comment #17 and i may bump the rating up.